A sure eternal perspective on reality is the best
way to remain full of inspiration as we impart
faith. Let us begin our investigation into the
personhood of children ‘in the beginning’. The
mystery of creation is a mystery of love. God
made from nothing a cosmos which was not Him.
All that exists is either created or Creator. Words
have always failed and always will fail to convey
the First Gift that God has given: life itself, which
is shared out from the Life-giver’s very Being. The
most Godlike reflection of the Life-giver in
creation is humankind. ‘Let us make man in our
image, after our likeness’ [Gen. 1:26].
Each human
has Godlike characteristics and the potential to
live—to love—like God, in God, for ever. 1 As God is Trinity, Three-One, so humanity is many-
called-to-be-one. This calling is the purpose of
human existence, and in its light the Church
teaches us how to live on earth and to raise our
children.
At a child’s birth a new person...is born
into the world, as the Lord said, showing us how
each new baby is, even for God, an ‘other’ who is
1 As God given Godlike freedom: his destiny cannot be
programmed by any other person, divine or
human. Orthodox anthropology—our
understanding of humans—is based on theology:
that is, on the revelation we have received of God.
The form of being we desire for our children is
the form God designed for humanity made in His
image.
By borrowing theology from our holy
predecessors we can assimilate principles to help
us follow in their steps in our families and
Church communities. Theology helps us to see
what love means in its eternal dimensions, so that
we can co-operate with God as He Is while we
live with our beloved children as we are and as
they are. It is real persons who live. That is why
Orthodox theology emphasizes the Personhood of
God and of humanity. And that is where the term
‘hypostasis’ comes in.
In the First Being, the Three Persons, the
Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, live as One
Being. Divineness, Divine Being, is a mystery of
Triune love. God is love as Trinity; even if there
were no creation Divine Life consists in mutual
self-giving Love. The Greek Fathers who have
given us the classic formulas to express Orthodox thinking about the Trinity chose the word
hypostasis for the Person: God is Three Hypostases
in One Nature.
In the Triune God each Hypostasis is utterly
unique and irreplaceable. The personal
characteristics of each remain mysterious to us,
and all our knowledge of the Holy Trinity—even
the very terms we dare to use—are received by
revelation through Christ and the saints. One
Person is Father (unbegotten, the source of
divinity), One is Son *begotten of the Father
outside time), One is Holy Spirit (who proceeds
eternally from the Father). In God, the three
Hypostases are one Being, with one will and one
life, Each One lives the fullness of the One Triune
Life, yet as Himself. Personhood is never in
isolation, and at the same time the Person is never
diluted, or dissolved. Each of the divine Persons
gives and receives from the other in personal
love. Each Hypostasis lives the life of the other
Persons as His own life. Love means communion;
hypostatic life means all-embracing love.
The full meaning of ‘person-hypostasis’ in
the Triune God will always be a mystery.
Personhood in man is indescribable, too; the
hypostasis is ‘the hidden man of the heart’ [1 Pet.
3:4] that each is called to become. Nevertheless,
from divine self-revelation, especially that of the
One Divine Person who became incarnate, Jesus
Christ, we learn what we need to know about
true Being. A wrongful idea of personhood in
God has drastic consequences for our
understanding of human purpose and fulfillment.
In religious beliefs where the ‘Ultimate Reality’ is
thought to be ‘beyond’ anything personal, human
personhood too loses its eternal worth, and
becomes something you must dissolve away.
Even between the Christian denominations the
understanding of Person-Hypostasis differs.
Some of these divergences are less obvious to
those who are not spiritually refined, even if they
may be experts in academic theology. So the
Orthodox Church remains anchored in the
Fathers’ thinking and vocabulary. As we sing at
the Liturgy, ‘Let us worship the undivided
Trinity, for the Same hath saved us’.
Literally, hypostasis means ‘what stands
under’ something, i.e., the reality of something as
it exists. ‘The hypostasis-persona is the inmost
principle of Absolute Being—its first and last
dimension’.
2 The divine Nature does not ‘come
first’ in the abstract, and then get divided out into
Three. The eternal personal element is what
makes Divinity not just an abstract idea but a
living Reality. God is self-existing only as a
Triune Being in whom Life is shared in Love. The
Persons are, each one, fully and eternally God.
3
Mankind is called to live as God lives, as
persons united by inter-personal love. A fulfilled
human person has found his own true self not by
a struggle for self-sufficiency, but by a grace-
given union with God and his fellow humans: by
love which sometimes reaches the point of what
is, in earthly terms, ‘self-denial’. This is the Gospel
paradox: to find our real selves we ‘lose
ourselves’. To live as persons we die as egocentric
earth-bound individuals. The map for self-
discover is traced in the Gospel commandments,
which are commandments of love.
4 Ultimately we
are called to embrace all being—divine and
created—in our own life, or as the Gospel
commandment says, to love God with all our
being and our fellow humans as our very selves.
To distinguish between a fallen human
being and the true self each one is called to be,
Orthodox theologians often use the word
‘individual’ for someone still in a state of sin and
fall, and ‘person’ for someone who has been
renewed by life in Christ. These theologians are
not denying our individuality; on the contrary, it
is sin that destroys our individuality because we
become enslaved to it [cf. John 834]. Persons are
free to embrace others’ lives in love. Use of the
word hypostasis for ‘person’ is helpful because the
English word person does not necessarily point to
the God-like form of being to which we are all
called. I hope that readers who are not used to
this term will become familiar with it, because it
can motivate us in our dealings with children, as
well as in our own spiritual development.
Love is extended to other persons not by
compulsion, but by a gift which becomes mutual
when the response is also love. In God the Love is
eternally Perfect, so that mutuality is a feature of
Divine Life-in-itself. God, our Creator and
Sustainer, extends His love to us and—this is the
greatest mystery—rejoices in our love which
unites us to Him, whoever we are, at whatever
stage in our physical, psychological or spiritual
development. When the Orthodox speak of grace
they mean Divine Life shared with a created
being. As important as the difference is between
Divine Being and created being, the similarities
offered to us are no less important. God’s image
and likeness appear in many aspects of humans,
but they are primarily manifested in man’s
hypostatic form of being. A fulfilled human being is
a God-like reality, a person who loves without
limit. Only to one who lives according to grace, to
divine life, can the term ‘hypostasis’ be truly
applied. Holiness is not a question of duty or
virtue as much as an opportunity to relate to God
and to other humans in joyfully-given and
humble love.
The saints are those who brought to
fruition the potential each human has. ‘In the act
of divinization grace exalts man from the
dimensions and patterns of the earth to the
dimensions and patterns of Divine Life’.5 Divine
Nature—the Essence or Divinity the Three
persons share—cannot be shared by any being
whose nature is created. We would cease to be
what we are if we exchanged our nature. God’s
Nature is not changed, either, by His outpouring
of His Being on creation. But by sharing His life,
His grace, with man, God sanctifies, deifies,
human existence. The saints, touched by grace,
experience the oneness of the divine Energy6 and
the triune-ness of the Persons. Having
experienced God as a personal Being, they
learned to live and develop as human persons by
co-operating with grace, trying to do everything
they do with God’s blessing. Their way of life is a
pattern for the path to true humanity, to one’s
real self.
There is nothing impersonal in God, and
no impersonal path connected to Him. It is by
experiencing God as the One whom we address
as Person or Persons, to whom we can say ‘Thou
art’, that we relate to God, who announced
Himself to Moses as ‘I am’. By living in harmony
with the divine ‘I am’, we can reach our own
created ‘I am’.
This theological vision lies behind all that
we do. How does the Living God live? How must
we try to live? The answer was revealed in the
most concrete way when God joined the human
race. When we say that Christ is a perfect man,
we do not only mean that He is utterly flawless;
we also mean that He is a perfect picture of what
every human should be like. In the measure that
we are unlike Christ, we could be described a
sub-human.
7 The Lord Jesus Christ and His
Mother are therefore the persons our children will
be directed to most often when we speak about
relating to God and the saints.
Parents, monks and nuns, children, single
people, clergy and laity—in the Church we are all
on the journey to personhood together. If we love
each other then we are recognizable as followers
of the Person-Model Jesus Christ. In that sense a
child can be more hypostatic than a mature
theologically trained adult. A childlike trust in
God in enjoined on all of us; children were set
forth as models by Christ. A heart which loves
unselfishly, which trusts and respects God, is
closer to Him and to all humanity than a proud
self-enclosed heart. Adults, especially educated
adults, are often less humble-minded and open-
hearted than children.
So a legitimate question arises:
can we
teach children anything when we are less pure
than they are? Yes, if we speak and act with
conscious personal love for each one. And if,
when we share information about God, we share
what the Church gives us, not as proud know-alls
but as older members of the same Family. We
should be models and guides for the young,
simply because we have lived longer, for
although they start out with experience of grace,
they start with blank slates as far as life outside
the womb is concerned.
If God has given us particular
responsibility and authority, through parenthood
or through our role—official or unofficial—in the
Church community, then we are commissioned to
be sources of wisdom for the children in our care.
Our respect for their personhood means we
cannot be reluctant as teachers, both because
children are so loveable, and because they need
our adult guidance and authority to lean on. In
our turn we look with humble and grateful
respect to those over us in authority, such as our
spiritual father, our hierarchs. We are all
commanded to serve each other whatever our
position, following the First Model, Christ, who
came to serve and give Himself so as t bring us all
to His Father as our Heavenly Father.
Every teacher is well advised to ask
himself sometimes as he thinks about his role:
‘Who am I to teach these precious souls?’ In the
Light of the Holy Spirit, the answer will echo in
his soul: ‘I am a repenting sinner, but I love these
children and want the best for them. The Son of
God became Son of the Virgin Mary to save me
too. Glory be to Jesus Christ our Savior. I will do
my best to share my certain hope in Him with the
children in my care.’ The vision of the Hypostasis
can radiate from every teacher’s heart with this
message: ‘God loves us, and I love you.’
-Excerpted from Conversations with
Children: Communicating Our Faith,
(Stavropegic Monastery of St. John the Baptist
Monastery, Essex), pp. 19-26.
1. Some Fathers make a useful distinction between image and
likeness: the image of God in man is given to all of us by nature,
whereas man’s realization in God’s likeness is potential,
achieved by free personal co-operation with God’s grace.
2.Archimandrite Sophrony, We Shall See Him as He Is (Stavropegic
Monastery of St. John the Baptist, Essex, 1988), p. 191. I
recommend this book for further reading about the hypostasis.
3. This is inadmissible for logical thinking, which demands that
what is absolute must be unique. God is not self-existing because
philosophical reasoning makes Him inevitable. Philosophical
reasoning makes Him inevitable because our reason imitates divine truth, but reason cannot reveal His form of Being as a
Trinity of Love. Only Pentecost does that.
4. Cf. Matt. 22:40.
5 We Shall See Him as He Is, p. 192.
6
This word is often used for the Greek word energeia, which the
Fathers used for grace, for God’s life poured out on creation. It is
also used in the plural, because the divine life is shared as light,
as love, and in other manifestations. The Fathers compared it to
the light and heat of the sun which reaches us. However, earthly
analogies and earthly vocabulary are inadequate to convey divine
reality to someone who has not shared the Fathers’ experience
of God.
7. I should make clear here that the Orthodox Church teaches that
humanity is never actually lost.